3.15. TI Deep Learning (TIDL)¶

3.15.1.1. Deep Learning Inference in Embedded Device¶

TIDL brings deep learning to the edge by enabling applications to leverage TI’s proprietary, highly optimized CNN/DNN implementation on the EVE and C66x DSP compute engines. TIDL initially targets use cases with 2D (typically vision) data on AM57x SoCs. There are not fundamental limitations preventing the use of TIDL for 1D or 3D input data blobs.

TIDL is a set of open-source Linux software packages and tools enabling offload of Deep Learning (inference only) compute workloads from Arm cores to hardware accelerators such as EVE and/or C66x DSP. The objective for TIDL is to hide complexity of a heterogeneous device for Machine Learning/Neural network applications, and help developers focus on their specific requirements. In this way, Arm cores are freed from heavy compute load of Deep Learning task and can be used for other roles in your application. This also allows to use traditional Computer Vision (via OpenCV) augmenting Deep Learning algorithms.

At the moment, TIDL software primarily enables Convolution Neural Network inference, using offline pre-trained models, stored in device file-system (no training on target device). Models trained using Caffe or Tensorflow-slim frameworks can be imported and converted (with provided import tool) for efficient execution on TI devices.

Additional performance benefits can be achieved by doing training using Caffe-Jacinto fork of Caffe, which includes functions for making convolution weight tensor sparse, thus giving opportunity for 3x-4x performance boost of convolutions layers.

Fig. 3.3 Deep Learnining development flow on AM57xx devices

3.15.1.2. Application space¶

Current version of TIDL software is targeting Computer Vision Deep Learning applications. Example applications include vision computers, barcode readers, machine vision cameras, industrial automation systems, optical inspection systems, industrial robots, currency counters, occupancy detectors, smart appliances and unmanned vehicles. In these cases color image tensors (Width x Height x 3, for BGR planes) are typically used, but it is possible to use other data types (E.g. gray scale and depth plane: Width x Height x 2 tensor)

Based on model and task, TIDL input data are similar, but output data will vary based on task:

Additional examples covering other application areas (speech, audio, predictive maintenance), are in the road map. Apart from Convolution Network topologies, support for RNN/LSTM layers and topologies, targetting processing of sequential data, are planned in future releases.

3.15.1.3. Supported Devices¶

TIDL software is intended for AM57xx Sitara devices, that either have DSP or EVE, or both accelerators:

• AM5749 (2xEVEs + 2xC66x DSPs)
• AM5746 (2xC66x DSPs)
• AM572x (2xC66x DSPs)
• AM571x (1xC66x DSP)
• AM5706 (1xC66x DSP)
• AM5708 (1xC66x DSP)

3.15.1.4. Verified networks topologies¶

It is necessary to understand that TIDL is not verified against arbitrary network topology that can run in Caffe or TF. Instead, we were focused on verification of layers and network topologies that make sense to be executed on power-constraint embedded devices. Some networks are too complex for power budget of few watts. So focus is put on networks that are not extremely computationally intensive and also not having very high memory requirements. The following topologies have been verified with TIDL software:

• Jacinto11 (similar to ResNet10), classification network
• JSeg21, pixel level segmentation network
• JDetNet, (similar to SSD-300/512), object detection network
• SqueezeNet
• InceptionV1
• MobileNetV1

Here are the graphs (created using TIDL viewer tool) of first three:

Fig. 3.4 Figure Jacinto11 (resnet10 motivated)

Fig. 3.5 Figure JSeg21 (SegNet motivated)

Fig. 3.6 Figure JDetNet (SSD-300/512 motivated)

Other network topologies are possible but they need to be verified. Majority of layers required (for inference only!) for classification, segmentation and detection tasks are implemented, though in some cases with certain parameter related constraints.

3.15.1.5. Neural network layers supported by TIDL¶

The following layer types/Inference features are supported:

1. Convolution Layer
2. Pooling Layer (Average and Max Pooling)
3. ReLU Layer
4. Element Wise Layer (Add, Max, Product)
5. Inner Product Layer (Fully Connected Layer)
6. Soft Max Layer
7. Bias Layer
8. Deconvolution Layer
9. Concatenate layer
10. ArgMax Layer
11. Scale Layer
12. PReLU Layer
13. Batch Normalization layer
14. ReLU6 Layer
15. Crop layer
16. Slice layer
17. Flatten layer
18. Split Layer
19. Detection Output Layer

3.15.1.6. Constraints on layer parameters¶

Layers in current release of TIDL Lib have certain parameter related constraints:

• Convolution Layer

  • Verified for kernel size up to 7x7 (Shall work for higher values also, but not validated)
  • Dilation vaild for parameter values of: 1,2,4
  • Stride values of 1 and 2 are supported.
  • Dense convolution flow is supported for only 1x1 and 3x3 kernels with stride = 1 and dilation =1
  • Maximum number of input and output channel supported: 1024.

• Deconvolution Layer

  • Number of groups shall be equal to the number of channels
  • Only supported stride value is 2

• Arg Max

  • Up to 15 input channels are supported for EVE core and up to 6 channels are supported for DSP core
  • out_max_val = false and top_k = 1 (Defaults) and axis = 1 (Supported only across channel)

• InnerProductLayer

  • Maximum input and output Nodes supported are 4096
  • The input data has to be flattened (That is C =1 and H =1 for the input data)
  • A flatten layer can be used before this layer in C > 1 and H > 1
  • If a global average Pooling also can be flattens the output
  • Input size has to be multiple of 8, because DSP implementation of the layer does aligned 8-byte double word loads

• Spatial Pooling Layer

  • Average and Max Pooling are supported with stride 1, 2, 4 and kernel sizes of 2x2,3x3,4x4 etc. STOCHASTIC Pooling not supported
  • Global Pooling supported for both Average and Max. The output data N=1 and H =1. The output W will be Updated with input ‘N’

• BiasLayer

  • Only one scalar bias per channel is supported.

• CancatLayet

  • Concatenate is only supported across channel (axis = 1; default).

• CropLayer

  • Only Spatial crop is supported (axis = 2; default).

• FlattenLayer

  • Keeps ‘N’ unchanged. Makes C=1 and H=1

• ScaleLayer

  • Only one scalar scale and bias per channel is supported.

• SliceLayer

  • Slice is only supported across channel (axis = 1; default).

• SoftmaxLayer

  • The input data has to be flattened (That is C =1 and H =1 for the input data)

• SSD

  • Only Caffe-Jacinto based SSD network is validated.
  • Reshape, Permute layers are supported only in the context of SSD network.
  • “share_location” has to be true
  • Tested with 4 and 5 heads.
  • SaveOutputParameter is ignored in TIDL inference.
  • Code_type is only tested with CENTER_SIZE.

• Tensorflow

  • Only Slim based models are validated. Please refer InceptionNetV1 and mobilenet_1.0 from below as examples for building your models.
  • TF-Slim: https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/research/slim

3.15.1.7. Important TIDL API framework features¶

Current implementation of TIDL API provides following important features:

• Multiple networks on different EVEs/DSPs can run concurrently

  We can run concurrently as many different networks as we have available accelerators. In case of AM5749 maximum number would be 4 (2 on 2xEVE and 2 on 2xDSP) - may need increase in default CMEM block size (~64MB per accelerator are advices - default setting is 192MB). Single unit of task execution is complete network, i.e. it is typically executed from start to end on only one EVE or DSP, but we can start one network with its own output in one EVE, and in parallel same or different network with its own input on second EVE.

• Same TIDL API based application code can run on EVE or DSP accelerator

  This can be achieved just by modifying a device type parameter More details in Introduction to Programming Model

• Certain networks could be split between EVE and DSP

  For certain networks (JDetNet is one example), it is beneficial to use concept of layer groups. One layer group runs on EVE and another on DSP. There are few layers which runs faster on DSP: SoftMax, Flatten and Concat layers. So in this case we are using DSP+EVE for single network.

3.15.2.1. TIDL API examples¶

This TIDL release comes with 5 examples provided in source, that can be cross-compiled on Linux x86 from top level Makefile (use tidl-examples as target), or on target file-system in: /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples (make).

3.15.2.2. Matrix GUI demo¶

Upon boot, Matrix-GUI is started with multiple button that can start many demos. In current release, PLSDK 5.0, there is sub-menu “TI Deep Learning” with three buttons:

• ImageNet classification using Jacinto11 model with pre-recorded real-world video clip.
• ImageNet classification using Jacinto11 model with pre-recorded video clip, synthetically created from several static video images (using ImageMagick convert tool)
• ImageNet classification using Jacinto11 model with live camera input.

Imagenet classification using Jacinto11 model https://github.com/tidsp/caffe-jacinto-models/tree/caffe-0.17/trained/image_classification/imagenet_jacintonet11v2/sparse, with video input coming from pre-recorded clip. It is decoded in real-time via GStreamer pipeline (involving IVAHD), and sent to OpenCV processing pipeline. Live camera input (default 640x480 resolution), or decoded video clip (320x320 resolution), are scaled down and central-cropped in run-time (using OpenCV API) to 224x224 before sending to TIDL API. Result of this processing is standard Imagenet classification output (1D vector with 1000 elements). Further there is provision to define subset of objects expected to be present in video clip or live camera input, so classification results. This allows additional decision filtering (by using list of classes provided as command line argument). Blue bounding rectangle (in main image window) is presented only when valid detection is reported. Class string of last successful is preserved until next detection (so if no object is detected, blue rectangle will disappear, but last class string remains).

Executable invoked from Matrix-GUI is in: /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/tidl_classification.

root@am57xx-evm:/usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification# ./tidl_classification -h
Usage: tidl_classification
  Will run all available networks if tidl is invoked without any arguments.
  Use -c to run a single network.
Optional arguments:
 -c                   Path to the configuration file
 -d <number of DSP cores> Number of DSP cores to use (0 - 2)
 -e <number of EVE cores> Number of EVE cores to use (0 - 2)
 -g <1|2>             Number of layer groups
 -l                   List of label strings (of all classes in model)
 -s                   List of strings with selected classes
 -i                   Video input (for camera:0,1 or video clip)
 -v                   Verbose output during execution
 -h                   Help

Here is an example (invoked from /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification folder), of classification using live camera input - stop at any time with mouse right-click on main image window. In this example two DSP cores only are used, so it could be run on AM5728 device as well:

cd /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification
./tidl_classification -g 1 -d 2 -e 0 -l ./imagenet.txt -s ./classlist.txt -i 1 -c ./stream_config_j11_v2.txt

Another example (invoked from /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification folder), of classification using pre-recorded video input (test2.mp4) - stop at any time with mouse right-click on main image window: Please note that video clip is looped as long as maximum frame count (specified in stream_config_j11_v2.txt) is not exceeded.

cd /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification
./tidl_classification -g 1 -d 2 -e 0 -l ./imagenet.txt -s ./classlist.txt -i ./clips/test2.mp4 -c ./stream_config_j11_v2.txt

On AM5749, we can leverage presence of EVE cores (“-e 2”). Also note that two layergroups are used (indicated with “-g 2”), meaning that two EVEs are involved and only one DSP, with several bottom layers (closest to output) executed on DSP. Also since DSP utilization for 2nd layergroup is low, it can balance workload for two EVEs (running rest of layers):

cd /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification
./tidl_classification -g 2 -d 1 -e 2 -l ./imagenet.txt -s ./classlist.txt -i 1 -c ./stream_config_j11_v2.txt
./tidl_classification -g 2 -d 1 -e 2 -l ./imagenet.txt -s ./classlist.txt -i ./clips/test10.mp4 -c ./stream_config_j11_v2.txt

Slightly higher performance (on AM5749) can be achieved if both DSP and both EVE cores are running concurrently (each core processes one frame independently). Please note that applicability of such approach depends on type of network. If EVE core does processing much faster than the DSP, this is not very useful.

cd /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification
./tidl_classification -g 1 -d 2 -e 2 -l ./imagenet.txt -s ./classlist.txt -i ./clips/test10.mp4 -c ./stream_config_j11_v2.txt

Please note that imagenet.txt is list of all classes (labels) that can be detected by the model specified in configuration file (stream_config_j11_v2.txt). List of filtered (allowed) detections is specified in ./classlist.txt (using subset of strings from imagenet.txt). E.g. currently following subset is used:

• coffee_mug
• coffeepot
• tennis_ball
• baseball
• sunglass
• sunglasses
• water_bottle
• pill_bottle
• beer_glass
• fountain_pen
• laptop
• notebook

Different group of classes using different inputs can be used for user defined testing. In that case, download square images (if aspect is not square, do central cropping first) and place in folder on Linux x86 (that has ImageMagick and ffmpeg installed). Following commands should be executed to create synthetic video clip that can be used in classification example:

# Linux x86 commands to create short video clip out of several static images that are morphed into each other
convert ./*.jpg -delay 500 -morph 300 -scale 320x320 %05d.jpg
ffmpeg -i %05d.jpg -vcodec libx264 -profile:v main -pix_fmt yuv420p -r 15 test.mp4

If video clip is captured or prepared externally (e.g. with the smartphone), object need to be centrally located (in run-time we do resize and central cropping). Then, it should be copied to /usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/classification/clips/ (or just overwrite test1.mp4 in that same folder).

3.15.2.2.1. Description of Matrix-GUI example¶

Example is based on “imagenet” and “test” examples, with few additions related to decision filtering and visualization. There are two source files only:

• main.cpp

  • Parse command line arguments (ParseArgs) and show help how to use the program (DisplayHelp)
  • Initialize configuration (using network model) and executors (DSPs or EVEs), as well as execution objects (frame input and output buffers).
  • Create windows with TIDL static image, Decoded clip or Live camera input and window with the list of enabled classes.
  • Main processing loop is in RunConfiguration
  • Additional functions: tf_postprocess (sort detections and check if top candidate is enabled in the subset) and ShowRegion (if decision is stable for last 3 frames).

• findclasses.cpp

  • Function populate_labels(), which reads all the model labels (E.g. 1000 strings for 1000-class imagenet classification model)
  • Function populate_selected_items(), which reads and verifies label names (using previous list of valid values), to be used in decision filtering.

3.15.3.1. Software Stack¶

Complexity of software is provided for better understanding only. It is expected that the user does programming based on TIDL API only.

In case TIDL uses DSP as accelerator there are three software layers:

• TIDL Library that runs on DSP C66
• OpenCL run-time, which runs on A15, and DSP
• TIDL API host wrapper, user space library

In case TIDL uses EVE as accelerator there are four software layers:

• TIDL Library that runs on EVE
• M4 service layer, acting as proxy between EVE and A15 Linux (considered to be part of OpenCL)
• OpenCL run-time, which runs on A15, but also on M4 (IPU1 which is reserved for TIDL OpenCL monitor role)
• TIDL API host wrapper, user space library

Please note that TIDL API package APIs are identical whether we use DSP or EVE (or both). User only needs to specify accelerator via parameter.

Fig. 3.7 Figure TIDL Software Stack

3.15.3.2. Additional public TI resources¶

Following two Caffe-related repositories (maintained by TI team) provides necessary tools for the training phase. Please use them as primary source of information for training, for TIDL inference software. They include modifications in Caffe source tree to enable higher compute performance (with TIDL inference).

3.15.3.3. Introduction to Programming Model¶

Public TIDL API interface is described in details at https://software-dl.ti.com/mctools/esd/docs/tidl-api/intro.html

In current release it has 3 classes only, allowing use of one or multiple neural network models that can run in parallel on independent EVEs or C66x cores.

Single unit of processing is a tensor (e.g. one image frame, but other inputs are also possible), which is typically processed by single accelerator (EVE or DSP), till completion. But in certain cases it is justified, from performance point of view, to split network layers into two layer groups. Than, we can have one layer group running on EVE and second layer group on DSP. This is done sequentially.

Top layer TIDL API and OpenCL are primarily service software layers (with respect to TIDL software, not NN), i.e. they help in simplifying programming model, IPC mechanism and memory management. Desired features are provided by TIDL Lib which runs in RTOS environment, either on EVE or DSP. This software layer is provided in closed firmware, and used as is, by end user.

3.15.3.4. Target file-system¶

- dra7-ipu1-fw.xem4 -> /lib/firmware/dra7-ipu1-fw.xem4.opencl-monitor
- dra7-dsp1-fw.xe66 -> /lib/firmware/dra7-dsp1-fw.xe66.opencl-monitor
- dra7-dsp2-fw.xe66 -> /lib/firmware/dra7-dsp2-fw.xe66.opencl-monitor

3.15.3.5. Input data format¶

Current release is mainly used with 2D inputs. Most frequent 2D input tensors are color images. Format has to be prepared in same like it was used during model training. Typically, this is following BGR plane interlaced format (common in OpenCV). That means, first 2D array is Blue color plane, next is Green color plane and finally Red color plane.

But, it is perfectly possible to have E.g. two planes on input only: E.g. one plane with Lidar distance measurements and second plane with illumination. This assumes that same format was used during training.

3.15.3.6. Output data format¶

• Image classification

  There is 1D vector at the output, one byte per class (log(softmax)). If model has 100 classes, output buffer will 100 bytes long, if model has 1000 classes, output buffer will be 1000 bytes long

• Image segmentation

  Output buffer is 2D buffer, typically WxH (Width and Height of input image). Each byte is class index of pixel in input image. Typically count of classes is one or two dozens (but has to be fewer than 255).

• Object detection

  Output buffer is a list of tuples including: class index, bounding box (4 parameters) and optionally probability metric.

3.15.3.7. Import Process¶

Import process is done in two steps.

• The first step deals with parsing of model parameters and network topology, and converting them into custom format that TIDL Lib can understand.
• The second step does calibration of dynamic quantization process by finding out ranges of activations for each layer. This is accomplished by invoking simulation (using native C implementation) which estimates initial values important for quantization process. These values are later updated on per frame basis, assuming strong temporal correlation between input frames.

During import process, some of layers will be coalesced into one TIDL Layer (e.g. convolution and ReLU layer). This is done to further leverage EVE architecture which allows certain operations for free. Structure of converted (but equivalent) network can be checked using TIDL network viewer.

We provide a tool (Linux x86 or Arm Linux port) to import the Model and Parameters trained using either caffe frame work or tensor flow frame work in PC. This tool will accept various parameters through import configuration file and generate the Model and Parameter file that the code will be executed using TIDL library across multiple EVE and DSP cores. The import configuration file is available in {TIDL_install_path}/test/testvecs/config/import

Sample Usage: tidl_model_import.out ./test/testvecs/config/import/tidl_import_jseg21.txt

The list of import configuration parameters is as below:

./tidl_model_import.out  ./import/tidl_import_j11_v2.txt

# Default - 0
randParams         = 0

# 0: Caffe, 1: TensorFlow, Default - 0
modelType          = 0

# 0: Fixed quantization By tarininng Framework, 1: Dynamic quantization by TIDL, Default - 1
quantizationStyle  = 1

# quantRoundAdd/100 will be added while rounding to integer, Default - 50
quantRoundAdd      = 50

# 0 : 8bit Unsigned, 1 : 8bit Signed Default - 1
inElementType      = 0

rawSampleInData    = 1

# Fold Batch Normalization Layer into TIDL Lib Conv Layer
foldBnInConv2D     = 1

# Weights are quantized into this many bits:
numParamBits       = 12

# Specify sparse of dense
Conv2dKernelType   = 1

# Network topology definition file
inputNetFile       = "import/dogs_deploy.prototxt"

# Parameter file
inputParamsFile    = "import/DOGS_iter_34000.caffemodel"

# Translated network stored into two files:
outputNetFile      = "tidl_net_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin"
outputParamsFile   = "tidl_param_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin"

# Calibration image file
sampleInData = "import/test.raw"

# Reference implementation executable, used in calibration (processes calibration image file)
tidlStatsTool = "import/eve_test_dl_algo_ref.out"

Processing config file ./tempDir/qunat_stats_config.txt !
0, TIDL_DataLayer                 ,  0,  -1 ,  1 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,
1, TIDL_BatchNormLayer            ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  0 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  1 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,
2, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  1 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  2 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,    1 ,   32 ,  112 ,  112 ,
3, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  2 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  3 ,    1 ,   32 ,  112 ,  112 ,    1 ,   32 ,   56 ,   56 ,
4, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  3 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  4 ,    1 ,   32 ,   56 ,   56 ,    1 ,   64 ,   56 ,   56 ,
5, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  4 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  5 ,    1 ,   64 ,   56 ,   56 ,    1 ,   64 ,   28 ,   28 ,
6, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  5 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  6 ,    1 ,   64 ,   28 ,   28 ,    1 ,  128 ,   28 ,   28 ,
7, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  6 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  7 ,    1 ,  128 ,   28 ,   28 ,    1 ,  128 ,   14 ,   14 ,
8, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  7 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  8 ,    1 ,  128 ,   14 ,   14 ,    1 ,  256 ,   14 ,   14 ,
9, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer          ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  8 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  9 ,    1 ,  256 ,   14 ,   14 ,    1 ,  256 ,    7 ,    7 ,
10, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  9 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 10 ,    1 ,  256 ,    7 ,    7 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,
11, TIDL_ConvolutionLayer         ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 10 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 11 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,
12, TIDL_PoolingLayer             ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 11 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 12 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,  512 ,
13, TIDL_InnerProductLayer        ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 12 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 13 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,  512 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,    9 ,
14, TIDL_SoftMaxLayer             ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 13 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 14 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,    9 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,    9 ,
15, TIDL_DataLayer                ,  0,   1 , -1 , 14 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  0 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,    9 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,
Layer ID    ,inBlkWidth  ,inBlkHeight ,inBlkPitch  ,outBlkWidth ,outBlkHeight,outBlkPitch ,numInChs    ,numOutChs   ,numProcInChs,numLclInChs ,numLclOutChs,numProcItrs ,numAccItrs  ,numHorBlock ,numVerBlock ,inBlkChPitch,outBlkChPitc,alignOrNot
  2           72           64           72           32           28           32            3           32            3            1            8            1            3            4            4         4608          896            1
  3           40           30           40           32           28           32            8            8            8            4            8            1            2            4            4         1200          896            1
  4           40           30           40           32           28           32           32           64           32            7            8            1            5            2            2         1200          896            1
  5           40           30           40           32           28           32           16           16           16            7            8            1            3            2            2         1200          896            1
  6           40           30           40           32           28           32           64          128           64            7            8            1           10            1            1         1200          896            1
  7           40           30           40           32           28           32           32           32           32            7            8            1            5            1            1         1200          896            1
  8           24           16           24           16           14           16          128          256          128            8            8            1           16            1            1          384          224            1
  9           24           16           24           16           14           16           64           64           64            8            8            1            8            1            1          384          224            1
 10           24            9           24           16            7           16          256          512          256            8            8            1           32            1            1          216          112            1
 11           24            9           24           16            7           16          128          128          128            8            8            1           16            1            1          216          112            1
  Processing Frame Number : 0

3.15.3.7.4. Splitting layers between layers groups¶

In order to use both DSP and EVE accelerators, it is possible to split the network into two sub-graphs using concept of layergroups. Than one layer group can be executed on EVE and another on DSP. Output of first group (running on EVE) will be used as input for DSP.

This can be accomplished in following way (providing an example for Jacinto11 network):

# Default - 0
randParams         = 0

# 0: Caffe, 1: TensorFlow, Default - 0
modelType          = 0

# 0: Fixed quantization By tarininng Framework, 1: Dynamic quantization by TIDL, Default - 1
quantizationStyle  = 1

# quantRoundAdd/100 will be added while rounding to integer, Default - 50
quantRoundAdd      = 25

numParamBits       = 8
# 0 : 8bit Unsigned, 1 : 8bit Signed Default - 1
inElementType      = 0

inputNetFile       = "../caffe_jacinto_models/trained/image_classification/imagenet_jacintonet11v2/sparse/deploy.prototxt"
inputParamsFile    = "../caffe_jacinto_models/trained/image_classification/imagenet_jacintonet11v2/sparse/imagenet_jacintonet11v2_iter_160000.caffemodel"
outputNetFile      = "./tidl_models/tidl_net_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin"
outputParamsFile   = "./tidl_models/tidl_param_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin"

sampleInData = "./input/preproc_0_224x224.y"
tidlStatsTool = "./bin/eve_test_dl_algo_ref.out"
layersGroupId    = 0       1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1       2       2       2       0
conv2dKernelType = 0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       0       1       1       1       1

Input and output layer belong to layer group 0. Layergroup 1 is dispatched to EVE, and layergroup 2 to DSP.

Second row (conv2dKernelType) indicates if computation is sparse (0) or dense (1).

After conversion, we can visualize the network:

tidl_viewer -p -d ./j11split.dot ./tidl_net_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin
dot -Tpdf ./j11split.dot -o ./j11split.pdf

Here is a graph (group 1 is executed on EVE, and group 2 is executed on DSP):

Output of layers group 1 is shared (common) with input buffer of layers group 2 so no extra buffer copy overhead. Due to this buffer allocation, sequential operation of EVE and DSP is necessary.

E.g. for 112x112 feature map, with 64 inputs, 64 outputs and 3x3 kernels, we need:
112x112x64x64x3x3 MAC operations = 4624229916 MAC operations

E.g. N_inputs = 4096 and N_outputs = 1000,
Fully Connected Layer MAC operations = N_inputs * N_outputs = 4096 * 1000 = 4096000 MAC operations

3.15.3.8. Viewer tool¶

Viewer tool does visualization of imported network model. More details available at https://software-dl.ti.com/mctools/esd/docs/tidl-api/viewer.html Here is an example command line:

root@am57xx-evm:/usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/test/testvecs/config/tidl_models# tidl_viewer
Usage: tidl_viewer -d <dot file name> <network binary file>
Version: 01.00.00.02.7b65cbb
Options:
-p              Print network layer info
-h              Display this help message




root@am57xx-evm:/usr/share/ti/tidl/examples/test/testvecs/config/tidl_models# tidl_viewer -p -d ./jacinto11.dot ./tidl_net_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin
  #  Name                  gId   #i   #o   i0   i1   i2   i3   i4   i5   i6   i7   o   #roi    #ch      h      w   #roi    #ch      h      w
  0, Data                ,  0,  -1 ,  1 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,
  1, BatchNorm           ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  0 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  1 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,
  2, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  1 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  2 ,    1 ,    3 ,  224 ,  224 ,    1 ,   32 ,  112 ,  112 ,
  3, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  2 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  3 ,    1 ,   32 ,  112 ,  112 ,    1 ,   32 ,   56 ,   56 ,
  4, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  3 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  4 ,    1 ,   32 ,   56 ,   56 ,    1 ,   64 ,   56 ,   56 ,
  5, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  4 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  5 ,    1 ,   64 ,   56 ,   56 ,    1 ,   64 ,   28 ,   28 ,
  6, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  5 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  6 ,    1 ,   64 ,   28 ,   28 ,    1 ,  128 ,   28 ,   28 ,
  7, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  6 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  7 ,    1 ,  128 ,   28 ,   28 ,    1 ,  128 ,   14 ,   14 ,
  8, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  7 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  8 ,    1 ,  128 ,   14 ,   14 ,    1 ,  256 ,   14 ,   14 ,
  9, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  8 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  9 ,    1 ,  256 ,   14 ,   14 ,    1 ,  256 ,    7 ,    7 ,
  10, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 ,  9 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 10 ,    1 ,  256 ,    7 ,    7 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,
  11, Convolution         ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 10 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 11 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,
  12, Pooling             ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 11 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 12 ,    1 ,  512 ,    7 ,    7 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,  512 ,
  13, InnerProduct        ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 12 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 13 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 ,  512 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 , 1000 ,
  14, SoftMax             ,  1,   1 ,  1 , 13 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x , 14 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 , 1000 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 , 1000 ,
  15, Data                ,  0,   1 , -1 , 14 ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  x ,  0 ,    1 ,    1 ,    1 , 1000 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,    0 ,

Output file is jacinto11.dot, that can be converted to PNG or PDF file on Linux x86, using (E.g.):

dot -Tpdf ./jacinto11.dot -o ./jacinto11.pdf

For networks with two layer groups, viewer generated graph clearly depicts layer group partitioning, typically top layers in EVE and bottom layers in DSP optimal group.

3.15.3.9. Simulation Tool¶

We provide simulation tool both in PLSDK Arm filesystem, and Linux x86 simulation tool. This is bit-exact simulation, so output of simulation tool is expected to be identical to the output of A5749 or AM57xx target. Please use this tool as convenience tool only (E.g. testing model on setup without target EVM).

Simulation tool can be used also to verify converted model accuracy (FP32 vs 8-bit implementation). It can run in parallel on x86 leveraging bigger number of cores (simulation tool is single thread implementation). Due to bit-exact simulation, performance of simulation tool cannot be used to predict target execution time, but it can used to validate model accuracy.

An example of configuration file, which includes specification of frame count to process, input image file (with one or more raw images), numerical format of input image file (signed or unsigned), trace folder and model files:

rawImage    = 1
numFrames   = 1
inData   = "./tmp.raw"
inElementType      = 0
traceDumpBaseName   = "./out/trace_dump_"
outData   = "stats_tool_out.bin"
netBinFile      = "./tidl_net_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin"
paramsBinFile   = "./tidl_param_imagenet_jacintonet11v2.bin"

In case multiple images need to be processed, below (or similar) script can be used:

 SRC_DIR=$1

 echo "#########################################################" >  TestResults.log
 echo "Testing in $SRC_DIR" >> TestResults.log
 echo "#########################################################" >> TestResults.log
 for filename in $SRC_DIR/*.png; do
      convert $filename -separate +channel -swap 0,2 -combine -colorspace sRGB ./sample_bgr.png
      convert ./sample_bgr.png  -interlace plane BGR:sample_img_256x256.raw
      ./eve_test_dl_algo.out sim.txt
      echo "$filename Results " >> TestResults.log
      hd stats_tool_out.bin | tee -a TestResults.log
done

Simulation tool ./eve_test_dl_algo.out is invoked with single command line argument:

./eve_test_dl_algo.out sim.txt

Simulation configuration file includes list of network modesl to execute, in this case only one: tild_config_j11.txt List is termined with: “0 ”:

1 ./tidl_config_j11_v2.txt
0

Sample confiuguration file used by simulation tool (tidl_config_j11_v2.txt):

rawImage    = 1
numFrames   = 1
preProcType  = 0
inData   = "./sample_img_256x256.raw"
traceDumpBaseName   = "./out/trace_dump_"
outData   = "stats_tool_out.bin"
updateNetWithStats   = 0
netBinFile      = "./tidl_net_model.bin"
paramsBinFile   = "./tidl_param_model.bin"

Results for all images in SRC_DIR will be directed to TestResults.log, and can be tested against Caffe-Jacinto desktop execution.

3.15.3.10. Summary of model porting steps¶

• After model creation using desktop framework (Caffe or TF), it is ncessary to verify accuracy of the model (using inference on desktop framework: Caffe/Caffe-Jacinto or TensorFlow).
• Import the final model (in case of Caffe-Jacinto, at the end of “sparse” phase) using above import procedure
• Verify accuracy (using smaller test data set than the one used in first step) using simulation tool. - Drop in accuracy (vs first step) should not be big (few percents).
• Test the network on the target, using TIDL API based program and imported model.

3.15.4.1. Example of training procedure¶

• Setup for data set collection of specific smaller objects.

  Apart from many publicly available image data sets, it is frequently the case that new data set need to be collected for specific use case. E.g. in industrial environment, is typically more predictable and often it is possible to ensure controlled environment with good illumination. For pick-and-place applications, set of objects that can appear in camera field-of-view is not infinite, but rather confined to few or few dozens classes. Using turn-table and photo booth with good illumination allows quick data set collection.

• Data set collection using AM57xx

  Data set images can be recorded by external camera device, or even using Camera Daughter card (of AM57xx). Suggested recorded format is H264, that offers good quality and can be efficiently decoded using GStreamer pipeline. It can last 15-20 seconds only (rotation period of turn-table). With slower fps (10-15fps), this provides 200-300 frames. Procedure can be repeated by changing distance and elevation (3-4 times), so total image count can be up to 2000-3000 frames per class. This can limit single class data collection time to 5-10min.

• Post-processing

  Video clips should be copied to Linux x86 for offline post-processing. FFMPEG package allows easy splitting of video clips into individual images. Since recording is made against uniform background, it is also possible to apply automated labeling procedure. Additional data set enhancements can be made using image augmentation scripts, easily increasing count of images 10-20x.

• Prepare LMDB files for the training

  Please refer to available scripts in github.com/tidsp/caffe-jacinto-models/scripts

• Do training from scratch or do transfer learning (fine-tuning)

  Frequently, it is good to start training using initial weights created with generic data set (like ImageNet). Bottom layers act like feature extractors, and only top 1 or few layers need to be fine tuned using data set that we just collected (as described in previous sets). In case of Jacinto11, good starting point is model created after “Initial” phase. We will need to repeat initial phase, but now using new data set, and using same layer names for those layers that we want to pre-load with earlier model. Further, training can be tuned by reducing base_lr (in train.prototxt), and increasing lr for top one or few layers. In this way bottom layers will be changed superficially, but top layers will adapt as necessary.

3.15.4.2. Where does the benefit of sparsification come from?¶

• Initially Deep Learning networks were implemented using Single Precision floating-point arithmetic’s (FP32). During last few years, more research has been done regarding quantization impact and reduced accuracy of arithmetic operations. In many cases, 8-bits, or even less (down to 2-4 bits) are considered sufficient for correct operation. This is explained with huge number of parameters (weights) that all contribute to operation accuracy. In case of DSP and EVE inference implementation, weights (controlled by parameter in import tool configuration file) can be quantized with 8-12 bit accuracy. Activation layer outputs (neuron output) are stored in memory with 8-bit accuracy (single byte). Accumulation is done with 40-bit accuracy, but final output is right-shifted before single byte is stored into memory. Right shift count is determined dynamically, uniquely for each layer and once per frame. More details can be found in https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2017_workshops/w4/papers/Mathew_Sparse_Quantized_Full_CVPR_2017_paper.pdf
• Additional optimization (described in above article) is based on sparsification of Convolution Layer weights. Individual weights are forced to zero during training. This is achieved during “L1 regularization” phase (enforcing fewer bigger weights at the expense of others) and “Sparse” when small weights are clamped to zero. We can specify desired training target (E.g. 70% or 80% of all weights to be zero). During inference, computation is reorganized so that multiplication with single weight parameter is done across all input values. If weight is zero multiplication against all input data (for that input channel) is skipped. All computation are done using pre-loaded blocks into local L2 memory (using “shadow” EDMA transfers).

3.15.5.1. Computation performance of verified networks¶

• Results in below table are collected FOR SINGLE CORE execution (EVE or DSP). EVE running at 650MHz and DSP running at 750MHz (CCS Setup, single core).
• J11, JSeg21, JDetNet, InceptionNetV1, Mobilenet, SqueezeNet:

• Sparsity provided in above table is average sparsity across all convolution layers.
• Optimal Model – with optimal placement of layers between EVE and DSP (certain NN layers run faster on DSP, like SoftMax; ARP32 in EVE emulates float operation in software, so this can be rather slow).

• From release PLSDK 5.1, default EVE speed is increased from 535MHz to 650MHz.

3.15.5.2. Accuracy of selected networks¶

Below tables are copied here for convenience, from https://github.com/tidsp/caffe-jacinto-models documents.

• Image classification : Top-1 classification accuracy indicates probability that ground truth is ranked highest. Top-5 classification accuracy indicates probability that ground truth is among top-5 ranking candidates.

• Image segmentation : Mean Intersection over Union is ratio between True Positives and sum of True Positives, False Negatives and False Positives

• Object Detection : Validation accuracy can be in classification accuracy or mean average precision (mAP). Please note change in accuracy between “Initial” (dense) and “Sparse” model (performance boost can be 2x-4x):