Notable exceptions in TI HDSL Solution when compared with SICK HDSL IP Core release version 1.07 are described below:
TI HDSL Solution's register map is register compatible with SICK HDSL IP Core release version 1.07, with a few exceptions listed below:
| Register(s) | Remarks |
|---|---|
| SYS_CTRL Bits 5:0 (FRST, LOOP, PRDY, SPPE, SPOL, OEN) | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| EVENT_H Bit 7 (INT) | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| EVENT_H Bit 1 (DTE) MASK_H Bit 1 (MDTE) ONLINE_STATUS_D_H Bit 1 (DTE) | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| EDGES | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| VERSION VERSION2 | Different implementation from SICK HDSL IP Core "Major Release Number" field is 4 bits wide instead of 2 bits. "Coding" field is not available. |
| RELEASE | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| MIR_SUM | Not available in TI HDSL Solution Please see SAFE_SUM (0x36) for getting summary information. |
| PIPE_S | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| PC_DATA | Not available in TI HDSL Solution Please see S_PC_DATA (0x37) for "short message" transactions. |
| ACC_ERR_CNT | Different implementation from SICK HDSL IP Core
|
| MAXACC MAXDEV | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| ENC2_ID | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| EVENT_S Bit 7 (SINT) | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| POSTX ONLINE_STATUS_D_L Bits 7:6 (POSTX) ONLINE_STATUS_1_L Bits 7:6 (POSTX) ONLINE_STATUS_2_L Bits 7:6 (POSTX) | Different implementation from SICK HDSL IP Core POSTX bits are available in a separate POSTX register (0x4F) instead of ONLINE_STATUS_D_L, ONLINE_STATUS_1_L and ONLINE_STATUS_2_L registers. |
| ONLINE_STATUS_D_H Bit 7 (INT) ONLINE_STATUS_1_H Bit 7 (SINT) | Not available in TI HDSL Solution |
| ONLINE_STATUS_D_H Bit 6 (SUM) | Different implementation from SICK HDSL IP Core SAFE_SUM is used instead of MIR_SUM. |
| VERSION2 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x44 instead of 0x0B |
| ENC2_ID | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x45 instead of 0x0F |
| STATUS2 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x46 instead of 0x18 |
| VPOS24 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x47 instead of 0x19 |
| VPOS23 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x48 instead of 0x1A |
| VPOS22 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x49 instead of 0x1B |
| VPOS21 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x4A instead of 0x1C |
| VPOS20 | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x4B instead of 0x1D |
| VPOSCRC2_H | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x4C instead of 0x1E |
| VPOSCRC2_L | Register address is different from SICK HDSL IP Core TI implementation uses 0x4D instead of 0x1F |